• Home
  • Subscribe
  • Articles
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Advertisements
The Birth Mag

Episiotomy in Childbirth: A Thing of the Past?

January 7, 2020

by Jessi Vining

I was nineteen the first time I saw a woman cut without her consent. As a wide-eyed baby doula I watched, my mouth hanging open, while the doctor sliced into my client’s flesh without using any anesthesia. She cried out in pain and surprise, and looked up at me in shock. This wasn’t supposed to be happening anymore, I thought. 

I had just finished reading Episiotomy and the Second Stage of Labor by Sheila Kitzinger and Penny Simkin – a small book summarizing the research and evidence showing routine episiotomy to be harmful, rather than beneficial for parent or infant. That book had been published in 1984, and so I had assumed that by 2011 most (if not all) doctors would have abandoned the surgical procedure altogether. Sadly, no.The last eight years of birth work have shown me that the practice of routine episiotomy still hasn’t been eradicated like I once assumed, or even truly restricted to the “emergency-only” status many care providers like to claim.

The History of Episiotomy

An episiotomy is a surgical cut to the perineum with scissors or scalpel to increase the size of the birth canal and hasten the birth of the baby. The procedure is done during the second stage of labor.

Though first described by a Scottish midwife in the 1740’s, episiotomy didn’t become a routine procedure in the U.S. until the 1920s. It should be noted that this was long before it was considered necessary to have research or evidence that a procedure was beneficial before adopting its widespread use. Despite the lack of evidence, episiotomy would remain a routine practice in the United States for the remainder of the century and by 1979, the overall rate of episiotomy in birth was 60%. Finally, in the 1980s and 1990s the first research papers on the effects of a procedure that had been used for decades were published and made available to practicing physicians. 

There have historically been two primary reasons used to justify episiotomy: 1. To prevent severe tearing and promote better healing by creating a clean, controlled cut and 2. To reduce trauma to the fetal head or reduce the length of time the head is in the birth canal (such as in cases of fetal distress).

It was immediately clear from the research that routine episiotomy did not carry the benefits many physicians believed, and in fact resulted in MORE severe tearing, increased pain and serious complications with healing postpartum. There were no clear benefits of routine episiotomy for the infant either. 

In 1996 the World Health Organization issued a recommendation that rates of episiotomy not exceed 10% and finally rates in the U.S. began to fall. By 2006 the rate of episiotomy in the U.S. had dropped to 25% of all births, and by 2012 it had dropped to 11.6%. 

Episiotomy Today

Despite decades of research which show definitive evidence against routine use of episiotomy, it can be hard to shift long-held medical opinion or practitioner routines. And so some providers have just kept on performing routine episiotomies.

Rates of episiotomy are still anecdotally higher in some practices with older physicians and in more rural areas. And though the overall number of episiotomies in the U.S. has been steadily going down, so has the number of vaginal births. With rates of cesarean section at 32% as of 2018, when you combine our rates of episiotomy, statistics reflect that roughly 43% of all births in the U.S. are accomplished involving some form of surgical procedure.

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) now actively recommends against the use of routine episiotomy in birth, as does the American College of Nurse Midwives (ACNM), and they advise that the procedure only take place when “medically necessary.”

However, the challenge with this recommendation is that no clear evidence exists to support any indications for the use of episiotomy, and so practitioners now perform episiotomy on an individual basis, as they see fit. While there are theoretical benefits to the use of episiotomy in certain situations such as in cases of identified fetal distress, to protect a preterm infant’s head, or to assist in dislodging shoulder dystocia etc, the actual benefit of episiotomy in these cases is unknown. As stated in the 2017 update of the Cochrane review of the research on episiotomy, “Clinicians must acknowledge that little, if any, evidence is available to define indications for use; however, it is clear that maternal benefit is not an indication.”

This remaining lack of evidence makes the use of episiotomy murky territory when it comes to informed consent. Because there are no evidence-based guidelines holding providers accountable for its use, patients have to rely on the expertise and knowledge of their care provider to determine when or if an episiotomy is actually necessary. 

And the majority of the time it isn’t necessary at all.

Implications for Current Practice

In 2015, a woman sued her doctor for assault and battery after he performed a brutal episiotomy, in which she was cut 12 different times without her consent. The video of this birth and the doctor’s actions is available on YouTube and went viral following its release. While difficult to watch, it is perhaps most shocking in its familiarity to birth workers. Rather than representing something outside of the norm, the deference to the physician and the vulnerability of the patient giving birth is replayed in thousands of birth rooms across the nation every day.

We watch on a regular basis as our clients’ attempts to advocate for themselves or decline procedures are ignored, invalidated, or mocked by other care providers or (shamefully) by ourselves. Often, unnecessary or harmful interventions are initiated due to routine or familiarity, rather than actual medical necessity. Nowhere is this perhaps more true than in the case of episiotomy.

I wish I could say that midwives were immune to this problem, but we simply aren’t. Last year I personally witnessed a midwife perform two episiotomies simply because “the pushing stage was long and she would’ve torn anyway.” The potential for unnecessary intervention to take place is possible for all care providers, and it is up to us to monitor and police ourselves in the restrictive use of episiotomy – because there is no evidence to back us up when we make the choice to initiate this unique intervention. Practitioners rely solely on their own intuition and intentions, and so it is up to us to hold ourselves accountable and keep rates of episiotomy low in our individual practices. Perhaps one day soon we will be able to look back and say that the use of routine episiotomy is truly a thing of the past.

Citations

Jiang, H., et al. (2017). Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 2. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000081.pub3.

King, T., Pinger, W. (2014). Evidence-Based Practice for Intrapartum Care: The Pearls of Midwifery. Journal of Midwifery and Women’s Health. 572-585.doi:10.1111/jmwh.12261

Searing, L. (2017). The big number: 21 percent of babies are born by C-section, nearly double the rate in 2000. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/the-big-number–21-percent-of-babies-are-born-by-c-section-nearly-double-the-rate-in-2000/2018/11/16/ae539bfe-e8ef-11e8-bbdb-72fdbf9d4fed_story.html

Smith, E. (2017). ICEA Position Paper: Episiotomy. https://icea.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Episiotomy-PP-2017.pdf

Zhang-Rutledge, K., et al. (2017). An Initiative to Reduce the Episiotomy Rate. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 130:1, 146-150. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002060 

Jessi Vining is a Certified Professional Midwife licensed in Oregon. She feels passionate about all things reading, writing and birth related. She co-owns Wilder Midwifery, a bilingual, LGBTQ+ positive and gender inclusive homebirth practice.

Filed Under: Midwifery, Skills and Protocols

Share

Facebook Google+ Twitter Pinterest Email

thebirthmag

Happy new year! 2020 was rough on the Birth Mag cr Happy new year! 2020 was rough on the Birth Mag crew, and we know it was for many of you as well. This turned out to be a terrible year to launch a new magazine project, but it's over, and we're moving forward.

What's next then? First and foremost, the next print issue is coming! Look for a sneak peek of the upcoming cover next week. We are also settling in to a more consistent release of digital content going forward. 

We are so thankful for everyone who has hung in there with us through the tumultuous ride that was 2020, and look forward to bringing you so much more in 2021!

#thebirthmag #birthwork #birthworkers #midwifery #doulalife
New on the website this week, from Dr. Ali Davis, New on the website this week, from Dr. Ali Davis, DC (@dr_ali_thechiro ): 

"Someone you know is LGBTQIA+, possibly even someone you love.
If you’ve been in practice for any length of time, chances are you have LGBTQIA+ clients.
Even if you don’t know which ones they are.
Even if you practice in a small rural town.
Even if you think your practice serves a 'different' niche of clientele."

Read the full article at www.thebirthmag.com 

#inclusivecare #inclusionmatters #lgbtqia #lgbtqbirthmatters #queerparents #thebirthmag #birthworkforall
Repost of a snippet of a live from @maytethewombdo Repost of a snippet of a live from @maytethewombdoula and @mujer_dela_tierra discussing violence in American midwifery. You can find the full length video over on Mayte's page, and I strongly encourage everyone, especially white midwives, to go watch it. There's some excellent explanation of differences between traditional midwifery (specifically parteras) and modern midwifery as typical in the USA, and the ways bias impacts care. Warning: this is a hard conversation and does include talk about loss of a baby.
New this week on the website, some thoughts from @ New this week on the website, some thoughts from @doula_barb of @birth_fort_worth on sustainable birthwork practices, because we all know that burnout is real.

"Sustainability.

These days, it almost seems like a buzz word in the birth world. A free download. A hashtag. A commodity, even.

In reality, though, sustainability in birthwork, particularly in the doula-world, means getting to do the work that sets your soul on fire for longer than a few years.

Sustainability means creating a business from which you don’t need to regularly take self-care, or 'burnout breaks'. It’s so much more than warm baths, massages, mantras and aromatherapy.

It’s understanding that you have value. It’s understanding that it’s ok to charge whatever it takes to make you feel GOOD about walking out the door and leaving your life behind for an unknown amount of time. It’s about business models and contracts. It’s about boundaries."

Read the entire article on www.thebirthmag.com (link in bio).

#birthwork #birthworkers #doulalife #midwifery #birthsupport #thebirthmag
New on TheBirthMag.com this week from Juli Tilsner New on TheBirthMag.com this week from Juli Tilsner (@midwifejuli.cornerstone ): 
"Continuity of care and continuous labor support are intertwined as one of the most difficult aspects of birth work.  They can lead to severe burnout and limit our income when we don’t have partnerships or backups available. We can easily justify taking more clients in a month than we know we should, making these exceptions because we tell ourselves 'they need us' and saying no breaks our hearts. Most of us have broken our own number of clients per month rule, maybe more than once. Maybe it turned out OK, possibly not."

Read the full article on the website. Link in bio!

Photo by @natbro.photo

#doula #doulalife #doulaservices #midwife #midwifery #midwifelife #birthwork #birthworkers #birthsupport
New on the website this week: Raichal Reed (@mcdon New on the website this week: Raichal Reed (@mcdonald_herbalist ) shares some information about waterbirth and Covid-19. 

"According to the CDC, 'There is no evidence that COVID-19 can be spread to humans through the use of pools and hot tubs. Proper operation, maintenance, and disinfection of pools and hot tubs should remove or inactive the virus that causes COVID-19'. All rules that currently stand for a birthing person to be able to be in the pool (no fever, respiratory issues, etc.) should stay the same so that those who are sick in general are not in the water. Infections and how they spread vary and because there is no current documentation as to every way a person can contract the COVID-19 it is important to have proper personal protective equipment with each birthing person. Currently the CDC has not found any traces of COVID-19 in any municipal water systems, but they have not properly studied well water so their research is to be determined."

You can read more on TheBirthMag.com! Link in bio.

#waterbirth #birthduringcovid19
#midwifery #birthsupport
#birthwork #bornin2020
The lactation issue is out! We had an abundance of The lactation issue is out! We had an abundance of delays, but they have now all been mailed. If you've been waiting on this issue, keep an eye on your mailbox, because it is on the way!
Community led, community based. The Birth Mag is l Community led, community based. The Birth Mag is looking for new submissions! Are you a birth worker? Are you interested in helping your fellow birth workers learn and grow to be more inclusive and educated on the issues birthing people are facing today? We want to hear from you! Compensation starts at $35 for any article that is used. Please e-mail us at thebirthmag@gmail.com for more information or to submit an article.
#Repost @thevaginachronicles
• • • • • •
There is so much to learn from this week. So much to give and receive. .
.
This list is not an extensive and in no particular order but it is some of the HARD and persistent work that we must do. .
.
Black people breastfeed. Even when we tell you no after you’ve asked 15 times if we want formula. Even when we are afraid of what it looks like and how we can continue It. Even when we see how you look at our breasts not understanding how different they can be. Even when we must figure out breastfeeding complexities by ourself. Even when we had to do it for you, before we could do it for our own children. .
.
WE BREASTFEED!
#Repost @blkbfingweek • • • • • • HAPP #Repost @blkbfingweek
• • • • • •
HAPPY BLACK BREASTFEEDING WEEK! 🤩

By our histories and by the truths we know from living, our possibilities are greater than any imagination. 

For all the days that have felt hopeless, we invite you to enter a period of nourishment to revive.

Where there has been loss, grief and uncertainty, our restoration is key to being present and imagining healthy futures. 

And all through #BBW20, we reclaim our time, lives and families. 

Let’s gooooooo! 

#ReviveRestoreReclaim #blackbreastfeedingweek

Artist: Andrea Pippins @andreapippins
#Repost @storkandcradleclasses • • • • • #Repost @storkandcradleclasses
• • • • • •
New York, New York

Today starts Native Breastfeeding Week. Here are some native breastfeeding facts you should know.

-“The mission of the Native Breastfeeding Week community is to reflect the diversity of native breast-feeding experiences and to encourage and uplift visibility of native breast-feeding experiences”
-“this community also helps to address the inequality and injustice of indigenous mothers and their abilities to practice their roles in accordance to the tribal communities they dissent from”
-American Indian and American Native rates of breastfeeding initiation is 73% versus the national average of 83%.
-Formula supplementation is high (97%) for mothers who didn’t initiate.
-many native mother’s insurance doesn’t cover donor milk which could greatly benefit infants.
-many native women lack breastfeeding support because of social and cultural norms.

Facts are from @ja_lyonhawk article posted at illusa.org 2019

Please visit Native Breastfeeding Week’s Facebook Page for info about the virtual events you can support this week. ❤️

#indigenousbreastfeeding #indigenouswomen #americanindian 
#nativebreastfeedingweek #blackibclc #ibclc #doulasupport #doulas #blackmidwives #midwives #breastfeedingsupport #storkandcradle
#Repost @taprootdoula • • • • • • Blac #Repost @taprootdoula
• • • • • •
Black Maternal Health Week is EVERY week •
•
Art @designedbydg •
•
The best way I’ve improved my ability to care for black parents is to listen to them. But before I could learn to listen, I had to commit to the LIFELONG task of confronting my biases against them. I must also commit over and over to the a promise that I would confront bias and racism I witness in my colleagues, providers, leadership and institution. This involves being brave, frank and unapologetic, and well-versed in the mechanisms for reporting abusive and problematic  behavior, even in situations with an imbalance of power (nurse v. physician, etc.) Anti-blackness is the default in our culture. As healthcare workers if we don’t intentionally, diligently, and sustainably work to confront and destroy our biases, these biases WILL lead to black birthing people and babies’ harm and death.
•
Every birth worker - doctor, nurse, doula, midwife - needs to invest in an anti-racism training - @rebirthequity ~ @theblackdoula ~ @shishi.rose ~ @abide_women are some leaders who receive compensation to help you confront your biases against black birthing people. Anti-racism training is not CULTURAL COMPETENCY TRAINING. Cultural competency training is required by most employers, it’s been around for a while, and it doesn’t change s#%^.
•
Follow 
@blackmamasmatter @4kira4moms to keep up to date on ways you can learn more and legislation that is working towards the goal of protecting black parents and babies from medical racism that causes harm.

#blackmamasmatter #maternalmortality #blackmaternalhealthweek
Load More... Follow on Instagram

Search

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter

Copyright 2021 The Birth Mag | Site design handcrafted by Station Seven